Live broadcast, February 18 -yesterday, China Basketball Association announced punishment for Xinjiang Guanghui basketball club. Xinhua news agency said it meant Zhou Qi had recovered his “free body”, the Basketball Association people interpreted that Zhou Qi could join other CBA clubs with “free body. At noon today, Xinjiang Guanghui men’s basketball club responded to the Zhou Qi incident, claiming that the club did not violate the rules, failed to communicate with the Chinese Basketball Association, and demanded that the punishment decision be withdrawn immediately.
Media person Mai Suifeng gengbo wrote: “Xinjiang men’s basketball said in an interview with the media today that the club has strictly followed the relevant requirements and regulations of CBA company in the past league process, if the unilateral handling method of the discipline and ethics committee of the Chinese Basketball Association has not been modified and changed more properly before the end of February, it will not be excluded from choosing to withdraw from the remaining games of the CBA league this season.”
The media director, where do I lie, wrote: “Guo Zhun, chairman of Xinjiang Guanghui Basketball Club, said Xinjiang Guanghui did not rule out the possibility of quitting the CBA league.”
Sheng Zhe, a media player, added the views of other Xinjiang teams, as follows:
1. Xinjiang Guanghui basketball club, as the participating unit, submits information and registers relevant materials according to CBA rules every year, all of which participate in the competition after being reviewed by various departments. Xinjiang, as the participating unit, only has the obligation to submit materials, does not have the qualification for examination, and has obtained the qualification approved by CBA. Xinjiang believes that this is legal and compliant. There is no violation.”
2. Have doubts about the trial process of the moral discipline committee. Xinjiang Guanghui basketball club said that the trial process did not follow the conventional process. Previously, this case had been shelved for a long time, but suddenly a person in charge of the club was invited to participate in the meeting in a short period of time, and the invitation was not made according to the agreed time, but in the form of temporary notice or interview. Xinjiang Guanghui basketball club said that they did not know the interview situation and content, and it was unfair to think that the disciplinary ethics committee was not following the form of hearing.
3. The capital exchange between Xinjiang Guanghui basketball club and CBA company is the normal participation fee and dividend fee, and there is no other capital exchange.
4. Xinjiang Guanghui basketball club cannot accept this punishment. If a reasonable and fair solution cannot be given to a team like Xinjiang, which has been rooted in Xinjiang for a long time and has contributed to Xinjiang basketball, CBA League and Chinese basketball, then they will withdraw from the subsequent games. I hope to get a solution before the end of the month to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the club.
Related News-Xinjiang responded to Zhou Qi’s incident: no violation was found and the Basketball Association failed to communicate and demanded immediate withdrawal of punishment.
Based on the investigation caused by Zhou Qi’s Xinjiang contract dispute, the Basketball Association punished Xinjiang!
*******************
Xinjiang men’s basketball and Zhou Qi’s entanglement